This story just keeps getting weirder.
Would Harper really be that stupid to be invovled in a bribe? Maybe, but that seems so incredibly unlikely (and completely unfounded in evidence - including the fact that Dona Cadman seems to support Harper's version of the facts).
Why do the Liberals only take the Cadmans' word some of the time?
Why would Harper threaten to sue to the Liberal party (where any backroom secrets could come out on examinations for discovery) if he wasn't worried about it?
Why are the Liberals specifically targeting Harper?
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment